Article Text

Original research
Association of the dysfunctional placentation endotype of prematurity with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
  1. Maria Pierro1,2,
  2. Eduardo Villamor-Martinez1,
  3. Elke van Westering-Kroon1,
  4. Maria Alvarez-Fuente3,
  5. Steven H Abman4,
  6. Eduardo Villamor1
  1. 1 Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
  3. 3 Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  4. 4 Pediatric Heart Lung Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eduardo Villamor, Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands 6229 HX, Netherlands; e.villamor{at}mumc.nl

Abstract

Background Antenatal pathological conditions are key in the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Pathophysiological pathways or endotypes leading to prematurity and perinatal lung injury can be clustered into two groups: infection and dysfunctional placentation, which include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies exploring the association between the dysfunctional placentation endotype and BPD.

Methods MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 2020 for studies reporting data on the diagnosis of HDP, IUGR or small for gestational age (SGA) and BPD risk. BPD was classified as BPD28 (supplemental oxygen on day 28), BPD36 (oxygen at 36 weeks postmenstrual age), severe BPD (≥ 30% oxygen or mechanical ventilation), BPD36/death and BPD-associated pulmonary hypertension.

Results Of 6319 studies screened, 211 (347 963 infants) were included. Meta-analysis showed an association between SGA/IUGR and BPD36 (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.79), severe BPD (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.29) and BPD/death (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.37). Exposure to HDP was not associated with BPD but was associated with decreased odds of BPD/death (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.94). Both HDP (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.80) and SGA/IUGR (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.86 to 3.02) were associated with BPD-associated pulmonary hypertension.

Conclusion When placental vascular dysfunction is accompanied by fetal growth restriction or being born SGA, it is associated with an increased risk of developing BPD and pulmonary hypertension. The placental dysfunction endotype of prematurity is strongly associated with the vascular phenotype of BPD.

Prospero registration number Review protocol was registered in PROSPERO database (ID=CRD42018086877).

  • clinical epidemiology
  • paediatric lung disaese

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • MP and EV-M contributed equally.

  • Contributors EV conceived and designed the study with input from the other authors. MP, EV-M, EvW-K and MA-F designed and executed the literature search, screened and reviewed the search results and abstracted the data. EV designed and conducted the analysis with input from MP, EV-M and MA-F. All authors contributed to the interpretation of analysis. MP, EV-M, EvW-K, and EV made the figures and tables. EV drafted the manuscript with input from the other authors. All authors reviewed the manuscript and provided important intellectual content. EV, MP and EV-M take responsibility for the article as a whole.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Linked Articles