Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 3 August 2007. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.075754
Thorax 2007;62:911-918
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
thx.2006.075754v1
62/10/911    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steingart, K. R
Right arrow Articles by Pai, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steingart, K. R
Right arrow Articles by Pai, M.

REVIEW

A systematic review of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Karen R Steingart1, Megan Henry2, Suman Laal3, Philip C Hopewell1, Andrew Ramsay4, Dick Menzies5, Jane Cunningham4, Karin Weldingh6, Madhukar Pai5

1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, and Francis J Curry National Tuberculosis Center, San Francisco, California, USA
2 County of Sacramento Department of Health and Human Services, Sacramento, California, USA
3 Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Departments of Pathology and Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
4 UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
5 Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Montréal Chest Institute and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
6 Statens Serum Institut, Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Copenhagen S, Denmark

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Madhukar Pai
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Canada, H3A 1A2;madhukar.pai{at}mcgill.ca


ABSTRACT
Conventional diagnostic tests for tuberculosis have several limitations and are often unhelpful in establishing the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Although commercial serological antibody based tests are available, their usefulness in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is unknown. A systematic review was conducted to assess the accuracy of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. In a comprehensive search, 21 studies that reported data on sensitivity and specificity for extrapulmonary tuberculosis were identified. These studies evaluated seven different commercial tests, with Anda-TB IgG accounting for 48% of the studies. The results showed that (1) all commercial tests provided highly variable estimates of sensitivity (range 0.00–1.00) and specificity (range 0.59–1.00) for all extrapulmonary sites combined; (2) the Anda-TB IgG kit showed highly variable sensitivity (range 0.26–1.00) and specificity (range 0.59–1.00) for all extrapulmonary sites combined; (3) for all tests combined, sensitivity estimates for both lymph node tuberculosis (range 0.23–1.00) and pleural tuberculosis (range 0.26–0.59) were poor and inconsistent; and (4) there were no data to determine the accuracy of the tests in children or in patients with HIV infection, the two groups for which the test would be most useful. At present, commercial antibody detection tests for extrapulmonary tuberculosis have no role in clinical care or case detection.


Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; FPR, false positive rate; TPR, true positive rate; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SROC, summary receiver operating characteristic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Trajman, M. Pai, K. Dheda, R. van Zyl Smit, A. A. Zwerling, R. Joshi, S. Kalantri, P. Daley, and D. Menzies
Novel tests for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion: what works and what does not?
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2008; 31(5): 1098 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society