Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 31 January 2006. doi:10.1136/thx.2005.049536
Thorax 2006;61:684-688
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
thx.2005.049536v1
61/8/684    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kappler, M
Right arrow Articles by Lang, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kappler, M
Right arrow Articles by Lang, T

CYSTIC FIBROSIS

Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum antibodies against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis

M Kappler, A Kraxner, D Reinhardt, B Ganster, M Griese, T Lang

Children’s University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Dr M Griese
von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Lindwurmstr 4, 80337 Munich, Germany; Matthias.Griese{at}med.uni-muenchen.de

Background: Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is possible if initiated early in the course of colonisation. To detect P aeruginosa as early as possible is therefore a major goal. This study was undertaken to validate a commercialised test for the detection of serum Pseudomonas antibodies in patients with CF.

Methods: A representative cross sectional analysis of serum antibodies against three Pseudomonas antigens (alkaline protease, elastase, and exotoxin A) was performed in 183 patients with CF of mean age 16.7 years and FEV1 85.9% predicted. The results were correlated with microbiological results from the previous 2 years to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. The following 2 years were assessed to determine prognostic predictive values.

Results: A combination of all three tested antibodies yielded the best results with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 96%, and a positive predictive value of 97%. These values were higher if only patients in whom sputum cultures were available were considered (n = 76, sensitivity 95%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%). The prognostic positive predictive value was high in intermittently infected patients (83%) but low in patients free of infection (33%), whereas the prognostic negative predictive value was high in patients free of infection (78%) and low in intermittently infected patients (58%).

Conclusions: Regular determination of serum antibodies may be useful in CF patients with negative or intermittent but not with positive P aeruginosa status. A rise in antibody titres indicates probable infection and eradication treatment may be initiated even in the absence of microbiological detection of P aeruginosa.


Abbreviations: AP, alkaline protease; CF, cystic fibrosis; E, elastase; EA, exotoxin A; ELISA, enzyme linked immunoassay; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; NPV, negative predictive value; OD, optical density; PPV, positive predictive value

Keywords: cystic fibrosis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; serum antibodies; serology; prognostic value




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. G. Upritchard, S. J. Cordwell, and I. L. Lamont
Immunoproteomics To Examine Cystic Fibrosis Host Interactions with Extracellular Pseudomonas aeruginosa Proteins
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2008; 76(10): 4624 - 4632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P M Farrell and J R W Govan
Pseudomonas serology: confusion, controversy, and challenges
Thorax, August 1, 2006; 61(8): 645 - 647.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society