|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESPIRATORY INFECTION |
1 Barnet General Hospital, Wellhouse Lane, Barnet EN5 3DJ, UK
2 Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, UK
3 Centre for Medical Microbiology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, UK
4 Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute & Wright Fleming Institute of Infection and Immunity, Imperial College, London, UK
5 Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J P Dilworth
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK; paul.dilworth{at}royalfree.nhs.uk
Background: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are a common reason for consulting general practitioners (GPs). In most cases the aetiology is unknown, yet most result in an antibiotic prescription. The aetiology of LRTI was investigated in a prospective controlled study.
Methods: Eighty adults presenting to GPs with acute LRTI were recruited together with 49 controls over 12 months. Throat swabs, nasal aspirates (patients and controls), and sputum (patients) were obtained and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays were used to detect Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, influenza viruses (AH1, AH3 and B), parainfluenza viruses 13, coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviruses, rhinoviruses, and enteroviruses. Standard sputum bacteriology was also performed. Outcome was recorded at a follow up visit.
Results: Potential pathogens were identified in 55 patients with LRTI (69%) and seven controls (14%; p<0.0001). The identification rate was 63% (viruses) and 26% (bacteria) for patients and 12% (p<0.0001) and 6% (p = 0.013), respectively, for controls. The most common organisms identified in the patients were rhinoviruses (33%), influenza viruses (24%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (19%) compared with 2% (p<0.001), 6% (p = 0.013), and 4% (p = 0.034), respectively, in controls. Multiple pathogens were identified in 18 of the 80 LRTI patients (22.5%) and in two of the 49 controls (4%; p = 0.011). Atypical organisms were rarely identified. Cases with bacterial aetiology were clinically indistinguishable from those with viral aetiology.
Conclusion: Patients presenting to GPs with acute adult LRTI predominantly have a viral illness which is most commonly caused by rhinoviruses and influenza viruses.
Abbreviations: LRTI, lower respiratory tract infections; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
Keywords: lower respiratory tract infection; polymerase chain reaction; rhinovirus; influenza virus; Streptococcus pneumoniae
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Maimon, C. Nopmaneejumruslers, and T. K. Marras Antibacterial class is not obviously important in outpatient pneumonia: a meta-analysis Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2008; 31(5): 1068 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L C Jennings, T P Anderson, K A Beynon, A Chua, R T R Laing, A M Werno, S A Young, S T Chambers, and D R Murdoch Incidence and characteristics of viral community-acquired pneumonia in adults Thorax, January 1, 2008; 63(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |