| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
SLEEP DISORDERED BREATHING |
1 WellSleep, Department of Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
2 Sleep/Wake Research Centre, Massey University, New Zealand
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Neill
WellSleep, Department of Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand; aneill{at}wnmeds.ac.nz
Background: It is unclear whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the treatment of choice for severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), is effective at improving outcomes in mild OSA.
Methods: To help define the role of humidified CPAP in mild OSA, a randomised crossover study was undertaken of patients with an apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) of 5–30/hour. Subjective sleepiness, objective wakefulness, mood, reaction time, and quality of life were measured at baseline, after 3 weeks treatment with humidified CPAP and 3 weeks sham CPAP (2 week washout).
Results: Twenty nine of 31 enrolled patients (age 25–67 years, seven women, mean (SD) body mass index 31.5 (6) kg/m2) completed the protocol. Humidified CPAP improved polysomnographic indices of OSA and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (2.4 points (95% CI 0.6 to 4.2)). Objective wakefulness (modified maintenance of wakefulness test) showed a trend towards improvement (5.2 minutes (95% CI –0.6 to 11)). Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (SF 36, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire), and reaction times (Psychomotor Vigilance Task) were not improved more than sham CPAP. Compliance with humidified and sham CPAP both averaged 4.9 hours/night. Placebo effects were evident in many outcomes and there was no clear treatment preference.
Conclusions: Humidified CPAP improves subjective sleepiness and possibly objective wakefulness but not reaction times, quality of life, or mood. These results do not support the routine use of CPAP in all patients with mild OSA, but offers some support for the trialling of CPAP in those with severe sleepiness.
Keywords: obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome; continuous positive airway pressure
Relevant Article
Thorax 2005 60: 357a.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. H. Sanders, J. M. Montserrat, R. Farre, and R. J. Givelber Positive Pressure Therapy: A Perspective on Evidence-based Outcomes and Methods of Application Proceedings of the ATS, February 15, 2008; 5(2): 161 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Haentjens, A. Van Meerhaeghe, A. Moscariello, S. De Weerdt, K. Poppe, A. Dupont, and B. Velkeniers The Impact of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Blood Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Evidence From a Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trials Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 757 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N S Marshall, M Barnes, N Travier, A J Campbell, R J Pierce, R D McEvoy, A M Neill, and P H Gander Continuous positive airway pressure reduces daytime sleepiness in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis Thorax, May 1, 2006; 61(5): 430 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Marcus, G. Rosen, S. L. D. Ward, A. C. Halbower, L. Sterni, J. Lutz, P. J. Stading, D. Bolduc, and N. Gordon Adherence to and Effectiveness of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): e442 - e451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, May 14, 2005; 330(7500): 1158 - 1158. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
