| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ASTHMA |
1 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
2 North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A-L Caress
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; ann.caress{at}manchester.ac.uk
Background: Current healthcare policy advocates patient participation in treatment decision making. However, in asthma there is little evidence regarding patients’ views on such involvement. This study explored the preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decisions, rationales for role preference, perceived facilitators of/barriers to involvement, and the interrelationship of role preference and demographic variables in a sample of patients with asthma.
Methods: A cross sectional survey was performed of 230 adults with clinician diagnosed asthma from 10 primary care sites and one specialist respiratory centre in north-west England. Preferred role in treatment decisions was assessed using the Control Preferences Scale.
Results: Fifty five (23.9%) preferred an active role, 82 (35.7%) a collaborative role, and 93 (40.4%) a passive role; 19 (8.2%) perceived their role as active compared with 45 (19.6%) collaborative and 166 (72.2%) passive. Only 33.5% (n = 77) of respondents attained their most preferred role; 55.2% (n = 127) were less involved than they preferred. Patient related, professional related, and organisational factors, especially quality and duration of consultations, facilitated or hampered involvement. Role preferences were not strongly associated with demographic variables or asthma severity.
Conclusions: This study in patients with asthma highlights the fact that there is a need for professional and patient education regarding partnership working, skilful communication, and innovative approaches to service delivery.
Keywords: asthma; decision making; patients’ views
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Kremer and G. Ironson Measuring the Involvement of People with HIV in Treatment Decision Making Using the Control Preferences Scale Med Decis Making, November 1, 2008; 28(6): 899 - 908. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M R Partridge, A-L Caress, C Brown, J Hennings, K Luker, A Woodcock, and M Campbell Can lay people deliver asthma self-management education as effectively as primary care based practice nurses? Thorax, September 1, 2008; 63(9): 778 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. R. Partridge Patient-centred asthma education in the emergency department: the case in favour Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2008; 31(5): 920 - 921. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. M. Clark, M. D. Cabana, B. Nan, Z. M. Gong, K. K. Slish, N. A. Birk, and N. Kaciroti The Clinician-Patient Partnership Paradigm: Outcomes Associated With Physician Communication Behavior Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 47(1): 49 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Kremer, G. Ironson, N. Schneiderman, and M. Hautzinger ``It's My Body'': Does Patient Involvement in Decision Making Reduce Decisional Conflict? Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 522 - 532. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Moffat, J. Cleland, T. van der Molen, and D. Price Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study Fam. Pract., February 1, 2007; 24(1): 65 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C J Griffiths Consultations for asthma: will greater patient involvement deliver better health? Thorax, March 1, 2005; 60(3): 177 - 178. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
