HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dahle, U R Articles by Caugant, D A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dahle, U R Articles by Caugant, D A

Tuberculosis in contacts need not indicate disease transmission

¹ Division of Infectious Disease Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P O Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway
² Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, P O Box 1, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
³ Institute of Microbiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
⁴ Section of Microbiology and Immunology, The Gade Institute, University of Bergen and Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr U R Dahle
Division of Infectious Disease Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P O Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway; ulf.dahle{at}fhi.no

Background: Traditional contact investigation is an important tool for controlling tuberculosis. It may also help to indicate drug susceptibility patterns when Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures are not available. Such investigations often underestimate the degree of transmission found by genotyping, but overestimation may also occur. This report is the result of a routine successive DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of M tuberculosis isolated in Norway.

Method: Fifteen immigrants belonging to the same community were notified with tuberculosis during February to September 2003. The mycobacterial isolates were analysed by RFLP.

Results: All 15 patients had social contact with each other and 13 belonged to the same church community. A total of 14 cultures were positive for M tuberculosis. Among these isolates, six different genotypes were found. Five patients had not acquired the infection from the putative source.

Conclusions: Reactivation of tuberculosis may occur in contacts during the development of an outbreak. In such situations, traditional contact investigations may overestimate the rate of transmission found by genotyping of M tuberculosis. When cultures are unavailable and presumed drug susceptibility patterns are based on that of contacts, such overestimation may lead to incorrect treatment of a patient. Contact investigations must be combined with genotyping of M tuberculosis to conclude how tuberculosis is transmitted. This is especially important in persons with several risk factors for infection.

Keywords: tuberculosis; transmission