Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dundas, I
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, S A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dundas, I
Right arrow Articles by McKenzie, S A
Thorax 2005;60:13-16
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society


ASTHMA

Diagnostic accuracy of bronchodilator responsiveness in wheezy children

I Dundas, E Y Chan, P D Bridge, S A McKenzie

Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, The Royal London Hospital, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr I Dundas
Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, The Royal London Hospital, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK;I.Dundas{at}qmul.ac.uk

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of bronchodilator responsiveness for asthma in 5–10 year old children.

Methods: Spirometric measurements were made in 142 children (58 wheezers) before and after 400 µg inhaled salbutamol.

Results: On a receiver operating characteristic curve, a 9% increase in predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was the cut off point that provided an acceptable balance of sensitivity and specificity for previous wheeze. This figure was 50% (95% CI 38 to 62) sensitive and 86% (95% CI 78 to 92) specific for detecting previous wheeze and multiplied the initial odds in favour of wheeze by a factor of 3.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 6.3).

Discussion: With an estimated pretest probability of wheeze of 10% in the community and 50% in a specialist clinic, the positive predictive values are 29% and 78%, respectively, for a 9% change. The value of bronchodilator responsiveness testing depends on the prevalence of wheeze in the population in which it is to be used.


Keywords: children; wheezing; asthma; bronchodilator responsiveness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. L. P. Brand, E. Baraldi, H. Bisgaard, A. L. Boner, J. A. Castro-Rodriguez, A. Custovic, J. de Blic, J. C. de Jongste, E. Eber, M. L. Everard, et al.
Definition, assessment and treatment of wheezing disorders in preschool children: an evidence-based approach
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2008; 32(4): 1096 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society