Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, A J
Right arrow Articles by Corris, P A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, A J
Right arrow Articles by Corris, P A
Thorax 2004;59:434-437
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society


LUNG TRANSPLANTATION

Objective assessment of criteria for selection of donor lungs suitable for transplantation

A J Fisher1, S C Donnelly2, G Pritchard1, J H Dark1, P A Corris1

1 Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and Immunobiology and Transplantation Research Group, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
2 Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, St Vincent’s Hospital and Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor P A Corris
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK; paul.corris{at}ncl.ac.uk

Background: Donor organ shortage severely limits lung transplantation as a therapeutic option, yet many potential donor lungs are deemed unsuitable by clinical selection criteria.

Methods: Of 39 consecutive potential donor lungs, 14 were accepted and 25 excluded by clinical selection criteria. All were evaluated prospectively by clinical assessment, bronchoscopy, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to evaluate objectively the discrimination of pulmonary infection and injury.

Results: Accepted donors were significantly younger than those excluded (mean (SD) age 36.7 (15.3) years v 49.5 (13.2) years; p = 0.009, unpaired t test) and were more likely to have suffered traumatic brain death (50% v 20%; p = 0.07, Fisher’s exact test). Oxygenation (PaO2:FiO2) was higher in accepted donors than in excluded donors (median (range) 63.2 (48–82.5) kPa v 43.1 (7.7–71.7) kPa; p = 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). Positive formal BAL culture was more frequent in accepted donors (75%) than in those excluded (43%; p = 0.1, Fisher’s exact test). There was no significant difference in the percentage and concentration of neutrophils in BAL fluid between accepted and excluded donors (median (range) 37.9 (0–96.9)% and 44.6 (0–1190)x103/ml v 36 (1–98.1)% and 46 (0.2–1457)x103/ml), nor in the BAL fluid concentration of tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} (140 (0–340) pg/ml v 160 (0–760) pg/ml) or interleukin 8 (810 (33–17 600) pg/ml v 540 (0–15 110) pg/ml).

Conclusion: Current selection criteria are poor discriminators of pulmonary injury and infection and lead to the exclusion of potentially usable donor lungs.


Keywords: lung transplantation; selection criteria




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. F. Angel, D. J. Levine, M. I. Restrepo, S. Johnson, E. Sako, A. Carpenter, J. Calhoon, J. E. Cornell, S. G. Adams, G. B. Chisholm, et al.
Impact of a Lung Transplantation Donor-Management Protocol on Lung Donation and Recipient Outcomes
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2006; 174(6): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society