|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ASTHMA |
1 Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW 2310, and Cooperative Research Centre for Asthma, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
2 Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2310, Australia
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor P G Gibson
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag #1, Hunter Mail Centre, Newcastle NSW 2310, Australia; mdpgg{at}mail.newcastle.edu.au
Background: Asthma guidelines vary in their recommendations for the initial dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to establish the optimal starting dose of ICS for asthma in adults.
Methods: Randomised controlled trials comparing two doses of the same ICS in adults with asthma and no concomitant inhaled or oral corticosteroid were assessed. Included trials were analysed according to the following ICS dose comparisons: high (
800 µg/day beclomethasone (BDP)) versus moderate (400<800 µg/day BDP) (n = 7); moderate versus low (<400 µg/day BDP) (n = 6); step down versus constant dose (n = 4).
Results: Fourteen publications describing 13 trials were included in the review. Studies (n = 4) that compared a step down approach with a constant moderate/low dose of ICS found no difference in lung function, symptoms, or rescue medications between the two treatment approaches (p>0.05). There was no difference in the change in morning peak flow after treatment with high compared with moderate dose ICS. When compared with low dose ICS, moderate dose ICS significantly improved morning peak flow (change from baseline WMD 11.14 l/min, 95% CI 1.34 to 20.93) and nocturnal symptoms (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.06).
Conclusions: For patients with asthma who require ICS, starting with a moderate dose is equivalent to starting with a high dose and stepping down. The small non-significant benefits of starting with a high ICS dose are not of sufficient clinical benefit to warrant its use. Initial moderate ICS doses appear to be more effective than an initial low ICS dose.
Keywords: asthma; inhaled corticosteroids; starting dose
Relevant Article
Thorax 2004 59: 1005.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Zervas, E. Oikonomidou, E. Kainis, M. Kokkala, K. Petroheilou, and M. Gaga Review: Control of asthma Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 141 - 148. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Bateman, S. S. Hurd, P. J. Barnes, J. Bousquet, J. M. Drazen, M. FitzGerald, P. Gibson, K. Ohta, P. O'Byrne, S. E. Pedersen, et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 143 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vogelmeier, A. D'Urzo, R. Pauwels{dagger}, J. M. Merino, M. Jaspal, S. Boutet, I. Naya, and D. Price Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy: an effective asthma treatment option? Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 819 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Masoli, M Weatherall, and R Beasley Optimal starting dose of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma: why has it taken so long? Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(2): 93 - 94. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Marcovitch What's new this month in BMJ Journals BMJ, January 15, 2005; 330(7483): 116 - 116. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Minerva BMJ, December 4, 2004; 329(7478): 1354 - 1354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |