|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Department of
Medicine, The University of Western Australia and the Asthma and
Allergy Research Institute Inc, Perth, Western Australia
Correspondence to: Dr H Vally, Asthma and Allergy Research Institute Inc, Ground Floor, E Block, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia hvally{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Received 23 October 2000; Returned to authors 16 February 2001; Revised version received 4 June 2001; Accepted for publication 27 June 2001
BACKGROUND
Wine
appears to be a significant trigger for asthma. Although sulfite
additives have been implicated as a major cause of wine induced asthma,
direct evidence is limited. Two studies were undertaken to assess
sulfite reactivity in wine sensitive asthmatics. The first study
assessed sensitivity to sulfites in wine using a single dose sulfited
wine challenge protocol followed by a double blind, placebo controlled
challenge. In the second study a cumulative dose sulfited wine
challenge protocol was employed to establish if wine sensitive
asthmatics as a group have an increased sensitivity to sulfites.
METHODS
In study 1, 24 asthmatic patients with a strong history of wine induced asthma were
screened. Subjects showing positive responses to single blind high
sulfite (300 ppm) wine challenge were rechallenged on separate days in
a double blind, placebo controlled fashion with wines of varying
sulfite levels to characterise their responses to these drinks. In
study 2, wine sensitive asthmatic patients (n=12) and control
asthmatics (n=6) were challenged cumulatively with wine containing
increasing concentrations of sulfite in order to characterise further
their sensitivity to sulfites in wine.
RESULTS
Four of the 24 self-reporting wine sensitive asthmatic patients were found to respond
to sulfite additives in wine when challenged in a single dose fashion
(study 1). In the double blind dose-response study all four had a
significant fall in forced expiratory volume in one second
(FEV1) (>15% from baseline) following exposure to wine
containing 300 ppm sulfite, but did not respond to wines containing 20, 75 or 150 ppm sulfite. Responses were maximal at 5 minutes (mean (SD)
maximal decline in FEV1 28.7 (13)%) and took 15-60
minutes to return to baseline levels. In the cumulative dose-response
study (study 2) no significant difference was observed in any of the
lung function parameters measured (FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), mid phase forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75)) between wine sensitive and normal asthmatic subjects.
CONCLUSIONS
Only a
small number of wine sensitive asthmatic patients responded to a single
dose challenge with sulfited wine under laboratory conditions. This may
suggest that the role of sulfites and/or wine in triggering asthmatic
responses has been overestimated. Alternatively, cofactors or other
components in wine may play an important role in wine induced asthma.
Cumulative sulfite dose challenges did not detect an increased
sensitivity to sulfite in wine sensitive asthmatics and an alternative
approach to identifying sulfite/wine sensitive asthma may be required.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Prousky The Treatment of Pulmonary Diseases and Respiratory-Related Conditions with Inhaled (Nebulized or Aerosolized) Glutathione Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., March 1, 2008; 5(1): 27 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |